The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn - I have nothing against the "one-hit wonder" title, just the "with only one pop hit" title. Will(
talk) 02:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Neutral My bad, I didn't notice the redirect. I fixed the headers on this AfD to reflect the actual article, to prevent further confusion.
Ten Pound Hammer • (((
Broken clamshells •
Otter chirps))) 23:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep One-hit wonders are notable...and I've wasted too much time on this page for it to be deleted.
۞ ░ 03:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep as long as VH1 keeps making specials about these, they're notable.
JJL 03:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep per existing arguments...
Ranma9617 04:51, 2 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep One hit wonders is a recognized term in the music industry and a phenomenon that does attract attention... and unlike SHalom's attempt to make
wp:POINT, this category can be supported via independent sources. One hit wonders are notable.
Balloonman 16:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep per most of the above, esp. Balloonman.
Carlossuarez46 18:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep. "One-hit wonder" is a standard term.
Doczilla 20:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.