The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Mostly un-sourced, could be OR. Sourcing is in non-RS, nor can I find anything. Not meeting notability.
Oaktree b (
talk) 02:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. This is an interesting case where one scholar has done extensive research and publishing on the subject. Different publishers, as well as peer review and reviews of books, and some passing or short mentions elsewhere, I'm inclined to say this level of depth meets
WP:GNG
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 02:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: Appears to be enough here in terms of in-depth secondary sources needed to pass GNG, although there some work needed to improve it to encyclopedia-level standards. In addition to the significant coverage provided, I found a couple of partial sources which provide additional info about Mayell and his family [
[1]][
[2]]
User:Let'srun 12:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.