The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per
WP:DEL-REASON 6: Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to
reliable sources, including
neologisms,
original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves
hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to
WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the princely state itself doesn't even exist anymore.
TompaDompa (
talk) 22:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete The ur.wiki article is sourced to RoyalArk, which is not a reliable source.
Mccapra (
talk) 02:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, full of original research. --
Ab207 (
talk) 17:19, 25 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. The page for the most recent blue link has no sources for the claim he holds the Nawab of Rampur in pretense, so who knows if anyone in this family even cares about succession.
JoelleJay (
talk) 20:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:LIST. This is a list about a now-defunct, non-sovereign state's heads of state, and is moot.
Bearian (
talk) 15:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.