The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. One blue link followed by dozens of unsourced names of living people. The article on the state itself is barely more than a stub.
JoelleJay (
talk) 21:12, 23 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:DEL-REASON 6: Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to
reliable sources, including
neologisms,
original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves
hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to
WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the princely state itself doesn't even exist anymore.
TompaDompa (
talk) 22:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Previously sourced to RoyalArk and I can’t find anything else to support it.
Mccapra (
talk) 03:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and the other comments above.
Smeat75 (
talk) 19:37, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:LIST; I've been consistent in wanting to delete such lists about the succession rights of non-sovereign states.
Bearian (
talk) 15:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.