From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Line of succession to the former throne of Dungarpur

Line of succession to the former throne of Dungarpur (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This kingdom has been defunct since 1949. This completely unsourced article looks like unverifiable original research, including about the supposed royal status of living persons ( WP:BLP). See also WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne for a similar case. Norden1990 ( talk) 19:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Norden1990 ( talk) 19:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 19:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. One blue link followed by dozens of unsourced names of living people. The article on the state itself is barely more than a stub. JoelleJay ( talk) 21:12, 23 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:DEL-REASON 6: Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the princely state itself doesn't even exist anymore. TompaDompa ( talk) 22:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Previously sourced to RoyalArk and I can’t find anything else to support it. Mccapra ( talk) 03:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:DEL-REASON 6. Nika2020 ( talk) 05:53, 24 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom and the other comments above. Smeat75 ( talk) 19:37, 24 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:LIST; I've been consistent in wanting to delete such lists about the succession rights of non-sovereign states. Bearian ( talk) 15:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.