The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Line of succession to these former thrones impossible to determine without verification, sourcing such as there is consists of one probably self-published website just giving the family but not the line.
PatGallacher (
talk) 18:44, 1 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:DEL-REASON 6: Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to
reliable sources, including
neologisms,
original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves
hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to
WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the Duchy itself doesn't even exist anymore.
TompaDompa (
talk) 19:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Too much OR and SYNTH. I don't believe this could be verifiably sourced and not contain substantial
WP:OR |
WP:SYNTH. //
Timothy :: talk 13:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.