The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails PORNBIO and lacks any reliable third party source to pass GNG. Was deprodded without improvement or explanation.
SpartazHumbug! 18:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails PORNBIO without award wins. Fails GNG: no substantial reliable source coverage found in search.
• Gene93k (
talk) 20:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Totally fails the relevant notability guidelines.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 00:18, 25 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - Fails GNG. Remarkable how porn bios all have horrible sourcing and great pictures, is it not?
Carrite (
talk) 00:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC) // Wikia is thattaway --->reply
Delete Fails GNG and PORNBIO.
LM2000 (
talk) 08:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Concur with nominator's assessment.
Finnegas (
talk) 12:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.