The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lin-ay kang Antique. Sandstein 11:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Lin-ay kang Antique 2015

Lin-ay kang Antique 2015 (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. hueman1 (talk) 22:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. hueman1 (talk) 22:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete unless proper independent, published sources offering in-depth coverage of this specific edition of the pageant can be found. The one source (currently in the External links section for some reason) is the briefest possible mention of the pageant, in an article about one of the pageant participants, so it doesn't help towards WP:GNG. The whole article is unverifiable because of lack of sources, and that is a significant problem. The Mirror Cracked ( talk) 22:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 22:28, 8 January 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete as it appears to be WP:CORPSPAM or PAGEANTSPAM. Wolfson5 ( talk) 21:09, 12 January 2020 (UTC) reply
• Redirect to Lin-ay kang Antique. Much better to merge some of the important stuff to the main page. _SUPER ^ASTIG 12:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.