- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 15:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Lil Huddy
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lil Huddy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not demonstrate notability of their own accord. Perhaps some information could be merged into the page for Charli D'Amelio. CaffeinAddict ( talk) 05:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CaffeinAddict ( talk) 05:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: yes he does demonstrate notability with significant coverage from several reliable sources. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 05:23, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: significant coverage from several reliable sources. -- Deansfa ( talk) 03:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Meets GNG:
1. Satenstein, Liana (September 2, 2020). "A Day in the Life of a TikTok Stylist". Vogue. Condé Nast. Retrieved January 9, 2021. - Not the main topic but still good coverage
2. Guglielmi, Jodi (June 10, 2020). "Charli D'Amelio and Chase Hudson Reunite on TikTok 2 Months After Split". People. Meredith Corporation. Retrieved January 9, 2021.
3. 3. Lorenz, Taylor (July 9, 2020). "It Looks Like a Reality Show. Why Not Just Make It One?". The New York Times. Retrieved January 9, 2021. - Again not the main topic but still good coverage. Add the hundreds of articles from situational and reliability-undiscussed sources and this is easily notable. SK2242 ( talk) 14:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.