The result was keep. One argument to delete besides nominator. Nominator withdrew. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular T · C 03:45, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete, The only references here are the companies website. The user has attempted to make it come within wiki standards but I still thinks this lacks notabilty. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 17:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete - i cant find any sources either, fails notablility. Dwayne was here! ♫ 17:29, 16 May 2010 (UTC) reply
KEEP I guess that I don't understand how this company doesn't have any notability? Could someone make this clear to me? All you have to do is make a quick search on google for LMT or Lewis Machine and Tool and you will easily find a handful of things that make this company notable. For instance their contract with the UK or the many products the USA military buy from them. They have played a key roll in the small arms industry in developing better weapons for our troupes, especially with their patented MRP. I admit that I am a new user here and I might not understand all that there is to know about Wikipedia, but I still stand by this article in saying that it shouldn't be deleted.-- Iskor12 ( talk) 12:09, 17 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Search for "Lewis Machine & Tool". 1 You will find at least 25 News articles for them.-- Iskor12 ( talk) 13:45, 17 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Thanks Hell in a bucket. I know that you are only doing what you think is best for Wikipedia and I respect that. I would love to see this article Withdrawn from the nomination. Thanks-- Iskor12 ( talk) 17:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep It is notable in the firearms community JohnDLG ( talk) 02:13, 18 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Here are 2 last things that I would like to add.
Keep — I HATE the way this is written, it's pretty much an ad as it sits. But the company is significant, it would seem. Carrite ( talk) 19:44, 18 May 2010 (UTC) reply