The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Not speedily as it has just come due for closure
StarMississippi 16:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. We are way past that stage. He has become notable enough for his own article. Giving proper coverage (literally everything here) at
Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections would create a due weight problem requiring a summary style
splitting off, resulting in what we have here, so there is no sense in deleting this article. --
Valjean (
talk) (PING me) 15:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Again, notable for a single event only. That it's a widely covered event doesn't change anything.
Simonm223 (
talk) 16:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep BLP1E requires three conditions to be met. #3, The event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented, is not met. The event is significant and his role in it is substantial and well documented. Also #2, The person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, does not appear to be met. He just testified in front of Congress recently. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 16:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep, perhaps SNOW? Per Muboshgu, this is a clear case of
WP:NOTBLP1E.
Jfire (
talk) 16:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep There are obviously enough sources about Parnas to establish his notability, his role was substantial and well enough documented – resulting in this long article – and
Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections is obviously long enough itself that that the substantial content here cannot be suitably merged.
Reywas92Talk 17:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep per Muboshgu, most of the
WP:BLP1E criteria don't apply.
hinnk (
talk) 02:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep per Muboshgu.
Sal2100 (
talk) 16:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)reply
As someone who agrees this should be a
WP:SNOW close, I think your comments here are inappropriate and counterproductive.
hinnk (
talk) 17:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.