The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 15:26, 2 September 2012 (UTC) reply
No sources at all reliable verifiable durable nor otherwise, obviously fails BAND and also does not meet the GNG based on my research, the article is furthermore poorly and amateurishly developed and appears to be a novice's work likely the band itself or a promoter based on the content and flow which breaks some other rules and for these and other insofar unmentioned but likely just as meritorious reasons etc etc we should delete this one. LuciferWildCat ( talk) 05:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC) reply