The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:28, 6 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Subject has over 10,000 citations on Google Scholar, which looked like a keep. The highest cited works have an extremely large number of coauthors. There are several with 100s of citations, however. The article is pretty promotional, and focuses too much on his BioInfoBank company. The sourcing is not great. I'm split between a keep and a
WP:TNT delete.
Russ Woodroofe (
talk) 09:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete There are absolutely 0 results for him on JSTOR, he doesn't meet the subject-specific notability guidelines for Academics.
Angus1986 (
talk) 11:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.