- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 00:19, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Leeds City bus station
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Leeds City bus station ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Mentions in books and run of the mill local news articles about bus route changes, but no significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBUILDING. SK2242 ( talk) 20:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SK2242 ( talk) 20:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SK2242 ( talk) 20:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Major transport hub in a large city. The worst case would be merger to Transport in Leeds per WP:ATD and so there's no case for deletion. Andrew🐉( talk) 23:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, By bus station standards, one of the bigger ones, largest in Yorkshire with 30 + bays. Bound to be reliable sources offline from when it was rebuilt in the mid-1990s, in Buses, Coach & Bus Week etc. Otherwise merge to Transport in Leeds#Bus/coach/taxi. Lilporchy ( talk) 05:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep A bus station of this age in a major city will obviously pass GNG because newspaper coverage was more comprehensive in this period. For example, “Big Plan For ’Buses. Leeds Scheme For Central Station” on p9 of the Leeds Mercury 2 June 1931. “Need in Leeds of a Central ’Bus Station.” on p5 of the Leeds Mercury 5 November 1932. “A Leeds 'Bus Station” on p8 of the Yorkshire Post and Leeds Intelligencer 23 July 1935. Plenty enough sources out there to write a whole article per WP:WHYN---- Pontificalibus 09:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per all above. Clearly notable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 23:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.