The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --
Ed (
Edgar181) 13:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Barely coherent essay on a non-notable topic. Fails
WP:GNG,
WP:V, and
WP:NOT.
Bradv 19:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete This has been recreated at least 3 times under different names. The first couple versions were a copy vio. This weird essay is the only thing this guy is interested in creating, and somehow it seems to be related to the facebook page used as a source, but I'm not sure how.
Natureium (
talk) 19:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete for all the reasons given above, and consider carrying over the
salting that was applied to the last title where the author repeatedly recreated this essay.
MarginalCost (
talk) 14:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. The
Nielsen Norman Group piece cited in the article could contribute to establishing notability, but the other sources are variously not reliable, not independent, or insubstantial; in the absence of any other sources, and especially any scholarly or journalistic sources,
WP:GNG is not met. –
Arms & Hearts (
talk) 23:09, 4 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.