- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Layer type
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Layer type ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article does not meet WP:GNG, no WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. Sources in the article are to a Programming reference for Windows Driver Kit, s discussion forum, Reddit, and Wikipedia. BEFORE showed nothing that contains SIGCOV. The article is about a technical detail, article sources and BEFORE show this; artoc;e is not about an encyclopedic topic WP:NOTEVERYTHING. // Timothy :: talk 23:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 23:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, or redirect to book type as a related concept (maybe a sentence could be added there). This is indeed some seriously crap sourcing, and I can't find anything to improve it with. Book type doesn't sparkle in that regard, but there are solid sources available for that ( [1]) even if they are not used. In contrast, all I can find for "layer type" is lots of dual- vs single-layer disc topics. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 21:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as failing GNG. I'm not sure if redirecting to book type is even feasible without non-questionable sources to support any info inserted there. This looks like something more suited for a glossary of DVD/optical disc terms (but we don't have one). ~ KN2731 { talk · contribs} 10:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clarkcj12 ( talk) 05:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clarkcj12 ( talk) 05:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.