The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
What makes those Pokemon
notable? There is a reception section here, but it is just a list of apperances, plushies, and side comments in the form of sentence or two in passing (so
WP:SIGCOV fail). Not a single source cited names those characters in their title, and even the quotes in the articles are pure plot summary like . Latios has the ability to make its foe see an image of what it has seen or imagines in its head. This Pokémon is intelligent and understands human speech." Anything else I see online in my BEFORE is a game-guide on how to obtain this unit or use it in a particular game (ex.
[1]). At best this can be redirected to
List of generation III Pokémon. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 05:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Clearly non-notable, and the reception section is terrible, showing a total lack of
WP:NPOV and mostly incorporating criticism of people who are very much not Pokemon fans. Not that it's anything substantive, since it's mostly just snippets of larger reviews unrelated to the Pokemon. Not enough here to make it pass GNG.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 06:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
List of generation III Pokémon - I couldn't find any coverage discussing these Pokemon in-depth, rather I found page after page of game guides and walkthroughs. They're insufficiently notable for a discrete article. (Which is a shame, as I love the
movie based around them....)
firefly (
t ·
c ) 07:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
List of generation III Pokémon per
Firefly. Some of the development and reception information about the subjects should be salvaged for
Pokemon Heroes, especially the entire paragraph's worth of cited critic reviews for the movie.
Haleth (
talk) 08:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect. I'd certainly agree with redirecting certain other Pokémon articles, particularly those which use multiple Pokémon to enhance notability. -
Bryn(talk)(contributions) 15:36, 16 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.