The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
T. Canens (
talk) 01:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak keep per
[1] and
[2]. It's not transparently clear to me that these pieces, both published in
Cross Rhythms, are independent, and they are certainly for a niche audience, but they're not nothing.
AleatoryPonderings (
talk) 22:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 01:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.