From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Lanie Alabanza-Barcena

Lanie Alabanza-Barcena (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We could not establish notability, with no changes since the last notification in 2020 Bexaendos ( talk) 20:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Fashion. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:44, 13 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep: The GlobalGrind piece is not that great but somewhat okay compared to the rest of the sources. The other sources are either user-generated profiles, or interviews. Both the Early life and the Other projects sections are written like a resume and need substantial editing. AmshitBalcon ( talk) 22:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete not seeing enough indepth coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 23:51, 13 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete None of the sources here are substantially about her, and some don't mention her at all. I found one more video interview, and an article by her about herself. The remainder are brief mentions or name-checks on advertisements for products. Possibly TOO SOON. Lamona ( talk) 02:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Might be TOOSOON, but Wikipedia isn't a place for resumes. Sources in article and BEFORE, showed promos, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse.  //  Timothy ::  talk  15:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.