- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 16:07, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Languages of A Song of Ice and Fire
- Languages of A Song of Ice and Fire ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
None of the languages are covered in-depth in-universe besides Dothraki and Valyrian, for which there are already articles, nor are they notable (besides Dothraki and Valyrian) The Verified Cactus 100% 21:58, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- Since there's not much substance to it, we could merge it into the main article. —
kwami (
talk) 22:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- The main article in question being A Song of Ice and Fire? The Verified Cactus 100% 22:36, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 22:50, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- Merge not enough for a stand-alone article unless Dothraki, etc. are merged back (which I don't support). World of A Song of Ice and Fire is a better target than A Song of Ice and Fire. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 02:26, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete As the article is unsourced outside of a fansite, and provides no claim of notability. As mentioned, the only actual notable languages in the group already have sections in other articles. If reliable, secondary sources can be found on any of the others, I would not be opposed to a selective merge to World of A Song of Ice and Fire, as suggested, but either way, this article should not be left as a stand alone article. 64.183.45.226 ( talk) 22:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - appears to be original research.-- Rpclod ( talk) 14:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing to merge, WP:OR fancruft. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 08:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.