The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep.
SpartazHumbug! 15:46, 12 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment - its not a temporary bridge, its a permanent fixture. And thinking back, I seem to recall it being used as the start finish of the indy car race course, although for the life of me, I can find no Ref for that :/ Exit2DOS •
Ctrl •
Alt •
Del 04:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep. As one of only two
Bailey bridges in Toronto, we want this article to sake of making the encyclopedia complete and comprehensive. We should also seek to cover all heritage listed things. The fact that a group has made the effort to list the thing is more than enough evidence of
notability. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 22:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Weak keep - It's significant enough to be written about in this
book. --
Whpq (
talk) 17:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep per arguments above. The bridge is not a temporary structure, and its method of construction plays no part in its notability, unless that construction was notable itself. Notability is evidenced by the links above.
Martin451 (
talk) 02:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.