The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Tone 16:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete, quickly if not speedily. Unreferenced, unencyclopedic consumer advice in first person voice.
First Light (
talk) 03:54, 1 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete. There has never been a consensus for articles like this to be speedable, despite repeated proposals. There were just too many ways to misuse such a criterion, but this would have been a textbook case. -- Blanchardb-Me•
MyEars•
MyMouth- timed 03:55, 1 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Thanks for clearing that up - I was looking for a speedy reason before it came here to Afd, and couldn't see one. It helped to understand why....
First Light (
talk) 16:03, 1 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Sure speedy. This has been identified as a hoax here
[1] in April. FWIW, but note identical text so it may be either a db-hoax or db-copyvio.
East of Borschov 07:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete - not an encyclopedia article, no reliable sources to verify the information. ~~ GB fan ~~talk 09:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.