The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 05:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete subject lacks significant coverage in reliable independent sources.
Legacypac (
talk) 09:11, 2 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per above - Article's unsourced and that's because there's sod all on Google, Delete. –
Davey2010Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - searches failed to turn up enough independent in-depth coverage to show they pass
WP:GNG.
Onel5969TT me 12:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.