The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ( No prejudice against speedy renomination per no participation herein other than from the nominator.) North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Kyle Dion

Kyle Dion (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:BASIC which calls for "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources". WP:MUSICBIO also calls for "multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician". While these ( [1], int, [2], [3]) are indeed mentions in secondary sources, they are stubby biographical pulp in music magazines. Said another way, Rolling Stones or Esquire have not selected this musician for a feature article. Add to that no significant musical contributions, no songs which have charted, and no awards, and this article appears to be a bit too soon. Magnolia677 ( talk) 12:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.