The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Notability not established. Claims aside (not supported by references) this is not a notable kickboxing organization. The article was PROD'd and also speedy deleted a number of times.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 08:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete A non notable fighter that does not pass the notability guidelines.
Ashbeckjonathan (
talk) 15:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete The only source is from the organization. My search found the usual routine fight announcements and results, but not the significant independent coverage required to meet
WP:GNG.
Papaursa (
talk) 20:46, 6 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. I see passing mentions in news media but no solid coverage that is about it as a subject in itself. Does Chinese language Wikipedia have an article on it? If it does then it isn't linked If nobody in its native country cares enough to write about it then I doubt it is notable globally. --
DanielRigal (
talk) 23:32, 6 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Note: "
Kunlun Fight(China)" has recently been created with the same content by the same author. I have put it up for speedy deletion as a duplicate. --
DanielRigal (
talk) 23:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Also worth noting that the number of creations I mentioned above have all been under variations of the name. Definitely persistent.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 08:57, 7 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.