- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JGHowes talk 02:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Kroen Group
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kroen Group ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fairly fails to meet WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:MULTSOURCES and WP:CORPDEPTH. Possible WP:ADPROMO Asketbouncer ( talk) 12:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Asketbouncer ( talk) 12:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 12:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 12:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Not salvable by independent sources even if we would want or need to save the article. The fairest of coverage is about an associated collection agency and even this because of an iteration before the current, Kroen-related ownership. The IT activities that this article attempts to promote are not independently covered. gidonb ( talk) 12:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 16:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 16:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. Can be closed. No need to relist. This nomination was 100% justified. gidonb ( talk) 00:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.