The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It would appear that the subject of this article fails tests of notability
WP:GNG,
WP:ANYBIO and so on. The references here are all passing mentions in other contexts.
Anyone can create a social media site, and I would argue that in Twitter, Instagram and Facebook links do not assist an assertion of notability. The
WP:A7 tag was
removed by the page creator. I have
done the due diligence and can find no evidence that Ms Zedek is a notable film or television actor. As always, I am happy to be proven wrong. Pete AU aka
Shirt58 (
talk) 10:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep : This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (there is now ample independent sources to prov its notability including IMDB
@
Rashkeqamar: If you're going to argue that subjects are notable, you need to be familiar with what our
general notability guideline says, as well as our guidelines on
WP:NOTABILITY. The fact that the subject has an IMDb presence does nothing to establish notability, the video clip you added does nothing to establish notability, and the two passing mentions Zedek has in the TOI and India.com articles do nothing to establish notability. Notability means that mainstream sources have written about the subject in depth, (no, interviews don't count) or that the subject meets one of our other criteria, like
WP:NACTOR.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 21:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
Aunva6talk -
contribs 14:33, 3 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete lack of sufficient reliable sources to show notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 01:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.