The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A few notes don't add up to notability. There appear to be no more references than are already noted in the article, and really only one of them, the article from the Herald, is acceptable--but that's just one article in a local paper.
Drmies (
talk) 17:54, 7 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - Cannot find the significant coverage to satisfy
WP:GNG. There are references as noted by the nominator, but there is a lack of in-depth coverage and the ones that are do not come from reliable sources. --
CNMall41 (
talk) 18:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Even if all of the named (but not cited) sources did discuss this company, they are
not reliable sources.
Bearian (
talk) 14:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.