The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Redirected to the author, which was reverted without rationale or improvement. The current sourcing is about the author, and mentions the book. Not enough in-depth coverage to show notability. Searches did not turn up enough to show it passes
WP:GNG.
Onel5969TT me 18:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)reply
It is highly unusual with Wikipedia articles on Norwegian non-fiction books. It is too new to have had any lasting impact. That said, the book was reviewed in nationwide Norwegian newspapers
Klassekampen and
Morgenbladet as well as a news article in
Dag og Tid (behind paywalls). Merge would be a good
WP:ATD.
Geschichte (
talk) 18:47, 10 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect as proposed by Nom, My search did not find anything supporting
WP:GNG and there is no article in the books language wiki.
Jeepday (
talk) 17:57, 23 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.