The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –
bradv🍁 06:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Actually passes
WP:GEOLAND as a legally recognized, populated place.
Smartyllama (
talk) 14:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)reply
What legal recognition does it carry, and what makes this a distinct place that we would cover separately from the surrounding area which is full of similar subdivisions? The GNIS database is notorious for mislabeling and actually cites the "Malcoms Roanoke Valley Map", not an official source. –
dlthewave☎ 12:54, 17 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 03:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete No reliable sources showing a pass of GEOLAND.
Sulfurboy (
talk) 04:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.