The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:18, 19 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Kinya Claiborne

Kinya Claiborne (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non notable individual. None of the awards are majors. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article is bombarded with multiple sources but none are independent reliable sources with any depth of coverage of her. A lot of PR and primary. Only source of any note is the New Yorker but thats primarily about a news event that she happened to have been at like many other people. Page is pure PR complete with official promo shot. duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^{( talk)} 13:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^{( talk)} 13:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC) reply

• Strong Delete As I just wrote on another discussion where Amandadoyle543 is involved - this is same editor who was center of COI discussion /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_142#Amandadoyle543 - a discussion whereby nothing seems to have come of it. Someone should look further into the editor! Furthermore the person who created this page has been blocked. Something not kosher here. MaskedSinger ( talk) 18:32, 12 June 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete. The subject does not meet the notability criteria. Sources used as references are either not independent (including press releases) or are minor/niche publications and do not represent significant coverage. TimBuck2 ( talk) 18:45, 19 June 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.