The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Since the delete rationale is already weak, I don't see the need to keep this open further with two keep votes, one of which gives a reasonable indication that there is some coverage in English and that further SIGCOV probably exists in Farsi. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 18:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. The sheer amount of results in Google Books and Scholar searching for Khandaniha+magazine (in English, not Farsi), convince me that this magazine (a popular one (per
[1] and
[2], with a forty year history) has SIGCOV.--Eostrix (
🦉 hoothoot🦉) 16:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep There is enough secondary sources available in Persian.
فرهنگ2016 (
talk) 18:40, 5 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.