The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Noting that we don’t ordinarily merge unsourced content to another article.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 00:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Not notable. This article was supposed to be merged a little while ago, but I guess that never happened. No refs. Subject does not deserve an article.
P,TO 19104 (
talk) (
contribs) 22:04, 3 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Strong delete Just because someone engages in antics to claim their house is an independent nation does not make it so. All the more so when they still pay property taxes and continue to recognize the local authority, and have not even gotten a small modicum of coverage.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 13:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Totally non notable. --
Devokewater (
talk) 21:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Possible cross-wiki spam. I recall someone tried to create an article about the
subject on SW and the consensus was to have it merged with the nation. —
Infogapp1 (
talk) 23:41, 8 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.