The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article as I found it was pure vanispam. A Google News search delivers nothing of any substance at all: there is no notability here.
Drmies (
talk) 04:23, 9 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete The history shows that a large amount of content, including all the references, has already been removed as spam. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 07:56, 9 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG. I cannot find any better sources.
Edwardx (
talk) 12:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Fluffy vanispam. Nothing found that we can use for sourcing.
Oaktree b (
talk) 17:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete At the beginning of the article, subject is introduced as an investor, but the continuation of the article is about a surgeon or doctor. Anyway the lack of sufficient sources is quite evident.
Alimovvarsu (
talk) 20:50, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.