The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are mostly single line mentions, press releases, and relate to the company he owns. Notability appears to be based on his firm buying gems.
reddogsix (
talk) 04:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Being mentioned in newspaper articles about other subjects isn't sufficient. The articles must be specifically about the subject of the WP article, in this case Kashif Khan. For example, the Toronto Star article is about a diamond, and had a statement by Khan about the diamond.
Mindmatrix 15:53, 28 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - As per nominator, lacking in in-depth notability.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 05:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment - What is Permanent protection? That is such an unusual !vote that I have to ask the author whether they have a
conflict of interest.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 05:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 12:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)reply
delete the sources need to be indepth about him as the subject, not a diamond. therefore fails WP:BIO.
LibStar (
talk) 01:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.