The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LizRead!Talk! 09:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Unnotable mayor holding an unnotable position. No sufficient sources found to indicate notability. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the size of the bundle.
AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (
talk) 05:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Glendora is nowhere close to large enough that its mayors would receive an automatic presumption of notability just for existing as mayors — the notability test at the local level of office hinges not on minimally verifying that the person exists, but on maximally sourcing substantial content about their political impact: specific things they did as mayor, specific projects they spearheaded as mayor, significant effects their mayoralty had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But there's nothing like that here, and the article is extremely overdependent on non-GNG-building junk sourcing, like Flickr photos and her own self-published campaign site, rather than evidence that she had anywhere near enough media coverage to pass NPOL #2.
Bearcat (
talk) 20:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per Bearcat. Also reads promotionally - it's not encyclopedic to talk about the fact you like fun runs.
SportingFlyerT·C 20:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.