The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ( NPASR) ( non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (yarn) @ 21:50, 22 December 2014 (UTC) reply

K kalan

K kalan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure if this fails WP:NOTESSAY, though it seems to fail WP:SIGCOV. It's not very well written and even if it may be notable it is unsourced and seems like it uses a lot of original research in its current form. —  kikichugirl ^inquire 22:30, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete as nom per WP:TNT. —  kikichugirl ^inquire 22:31, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC) reply

I've strickenthrough the delete !vote of nominator to avoid confusion, and as being nominator they are presumed to be in favor of deletion with their nomination rationale. They may however add addition rationale as many they want, but not !vote twice or simply more than once. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 11:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC) reply

• Speedy Keep -recognized geographical places are considered to be notable for inclusion on Wikipedia per WP:GEOLAND. However, the village name 'K Kalan' is quite confusing here as in 'K Kalan', 'K' seems to be abbreviation of something unknown. Searching for 'K Kalan' in Census of India official website results many entries. Looking close in census directory for any similar village name in Bijbehara tehsil in Anantnag district, the most plausible name appears to be, "Khush Roi Kalan" (census data added by original creator, also matched). I've re-written the article as a whole from this to this. It should be OK now. Nominator may want to withdraw their nomination? Anupmehra - Let's talk! 12:37, 13 December 2014 (UTC) reply

FYI, I've move the page to its correct title " Khush Roi Kalan". Anupmehra - Let's talk! 12:40, 13 December 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Northamerica1000: -I don't see a reason to relist this one. It should better have been closed early as keep per SNOW or speedy keep per SK#1 (nominator failed to advance an argument for deletion). Anupmehra - Let's talk! 08:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC) reply

I don't think me and you counts as consensus, though. I like the improvements made to the article, but a google search reveals all that there is to know is really the census data and its coordinates, rendering it an eternal stub. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and this article in its current form is just coordinates and census data. If there's something to be said about the history of this place, or something else that allows it to pass WP:SIGCOV, then I'd be happy to reconsider or withdraw my nomination. —  kikichugirl ^inquire 08:53, 17 December 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Kikichugirl: Did you take a look at WP:GEOLAND and the sources cited in the article? -It is a 'recognized geographical place'. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 12:14, 17 December 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.