The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify. This isn't a consensus opinion but this discussion has been relisted three times and it seems like the resolution that most participants could be satisfied with. LizRead!Talk! 22:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment I consider it bad faith to send articles to AFD the day that they are created. Just because it hasn't gone on the air yet is not a valid reason to send it to AFD. PROD is typically the first step to deletion, then if that is contested, then AFD is the next step. I recommend closing this AFD until more time has passed to give the page author more time to add to it.
ArcAngel (talk) 21:14, 13 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete or draftify The article isn't properly sourced and fails GNG. Happy to send it to draft space if it's TOOSOON or it needs time to be improved.
SportingFlyerT·C 00:20, 15 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:26, 20 July 2023 (UTC)reply
•COMMENT - This article is literally one week old, we need to give it time before doing an AFD.
PaulGamerBoy360 (
talk) 01:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 13:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I'm confused: the article says the station has been on the air since 2022 but the nomination says it's not on the air yet.
Keep This article shows information about this Telemundo affiliate owned by Gray Television. It has true info. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
BMarGlines (
talk •
contribs) 18:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 20:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Yep, the very same concern that I raised above.
ArcAngel (talk) 01:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Procedural keep It's just too early. Is the sourcing probably going to be kinda flimsy for this? Yes. Would a merge to
KAIT be worth considering? Maybe. But give the article some time.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 05:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.