From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep WP:SK#1 - not a valid rationale for deletion.. ansh 666 23:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC) reply

K11UU-D

K11UU-D (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is abandoned and clearly has many issues, it also has nothing to offer to wikipedia as an article on its own, i think it should be deleted or merged. ReeceTheHawk ( talk) 14:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Weak keep Television stations that broadcast on-air (especially with the distinction of being the sole carrier for Bahai' broadcasting in American Samoa) should be considered generally notable. Sourcing needs to be improved. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 15:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Very poor nomination that does not give a valid deletion rationale. 198.58.171.47 ( talk) 20:12, 14 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.