The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete via
WP:G3. It probably also could have qualified as an attack page, given the "source" at the bottom of the page and the feeling that this was about someone that the editor knows IRL.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:29, 8 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Sadly, no evidence of notabilty.subject of the Article fails
WP:GNG as a result of lack of significant coverages to
reliable sources. In addition, no correlation with the bulk of references supplied with the subject of the article.
Wikicology (
talk) 22:20, 7 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment-The article is an obvious hoax if you look up "Justin Oberg" and "Provo" in Google. I put it up for a speedy delete. -
Takeaway (
talk) 03:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.