The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I don't think winning an online competition for a TV show that flopped big time and being second Unit director on a few films makes him notable enough for a WIkipedia page.
Comment Completing nomination on behalf of above IP. As for my own view, at a first pass the list of references looks to be heavy on primary sources and passing mentions. The fusedfilm.com and Commercial Appeal refs might be the best ones here, but the links aren't working for me. Notability looks sketchy, but I'll defer a formal !vote until I can look into it further. --
Finngalltalk 16:01, 2 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable filmmaker. It appears to me we have another deletion nomination for a different article on this same, although the whole thing has confused me.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 17:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment – A duplicate nomination was located at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/justin gullett, which I have procedureally closed. I have copied the nominator's rationale (
link) here (below).
User:Johnpacklambert has also opined to delete in this discussion, so I have not copied their delete !vote at that discussion to here. North America1000 05:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)reply
I am a single male, so my vote should be denominated as "his" not "their".
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 03:12, 10 September 2016 (UTC)reply
does not match notability standards. Won filmmaking competition in TV show that was not successful and has not had major role in filmmaking world since.
Unopeneddoor (
talk) 08:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.