The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 06:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:GNG. The work she is doing is honorable, but she does not qualify for a Wikipedia page at the moment. The books she has edited or written have not received any significant coverage either. All the Ghits are trivial mentions or quotes in the media.
Susana Hodge (
talk) 10:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - Seems to pass
WP:GNG. Articles about subject in Huffington Post
[1], Psychology Today
[2], Voice of America
[3] and over 50 non- trivial mentions or quotations in The Atlantic, Business Insider, LA Times, The Guardian, on CNN and ABC News, etc.
CBS527Talk 02:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 17:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep per sources noted above.
ABF99 (
talk) 04:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
T. Canens (
talk) 18:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.