The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Judy Gutierrez Travis

Judy Gutierrez Travis (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There was an article on this subject a while ago under the title "Judy Travis" but I nominated it for deletion because I did not think there was enough notability. I think the same can be said here. I think this article is a bit too promotional (see the Philanthropy section) and some of the sources are not reliable (#1, #5, #7, #16, #18, #22) and some of the sources such as #6 and #8 are just articles about a specific "viral" video. I'm just not seeing enough to warrant having an article on this person. I'm not seeing what the significance is, and I know this technically could be said about all YouTubers with Wikipedia articles, but I just think there isn't enough here. Andise1 ( talk) 02:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• SNOW Delete as has been CU-confirmed by a mass-advertiser involving 2-3 campaigns as it is, current article's information and sources are simply clear published and republished PR announcements. SwisterTwister talk 00:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC) reply
• Comment - I also nominated Benji Travis for deletion because a lot of the sources used in this article were used on that one, and his article appears NPOV like this one does. Andise1 ( talk) 00:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete as spam; same as the spouse: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benji Travis. Cookie-cutter spam articles. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.