From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The IP who requested that this article be nominated for deletion is a block-evading editor who was blocked for sockpuppetry. The Bushranger One ping only 22:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Jovancov kamen

Jovancov kamen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Request per my talk page. Eteethan (talk)🎄 20:09, 26 December 2015 (UTC) reply

  • Delete Jovancov kamen is lower peak of the Cudinska planina and it is not necessary to have a separate page. 77.105.24.109 ( talk) 20:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Per Wikipedia's remit as a gazetteer geographic features are notable. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC) Striking my !vote - see my closing comment. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:34, 27 December 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Jovancov kamen is only one insignificant peak within Cudinska planina peaks. In addition to top-level Aramlija one, there are around twenty of them and when even the highest peak does not your page, why would an irrelevant and unknown peak had his own page when there are pages of the mountain on which it is located. Then coordinates Jovancov kamen are inaccurate but it coordinates most points Aramlija. So the coordinates are wrong and this is the main reason why you should delete the page. Then the question is whether the height is correct or not. Jovancov kamen is really unknown location and for the Serbs and Bulgarians. Because of these irregularities page to be deleted. 77.105.24.109 ( talk) 22:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.