The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nobody seems to explicitly oppose deletion. Sandstein 12:42, 16 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Non-notable, relatively new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet
WP:NJournals or
WP:GNG.
Randykitty (
talk) 15:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)reply
There are more than a few independent sources added. Possibly in wrong category or different stub should be used for such journals?
Eplaner (
talk) 13:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment Normally, the links that you added are routinely removed from articles on academic journals, because they are all rather trivial. As far as I can see, some are to user-contributed databases, others are to not-very-selective databases (DOAJ, Croatian journal portal, etc) or to library catalogs (one -Western Theological Seminary- even simply stating that it is mirroring DOAJ). None of these links show in-depth coverage by an independent reliable source (necessary for GNG) or indexing in a selective database (needed for NJournals; note that not both GNG and NJournals need to be met, either one is sufficient). --
Randykitty (
talk) 13:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC)reply
INSPEC is still not selective enough database?
Eplaner (
talk) 22:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)reply
If it were, I wouldn't have taken this to AfD. No, sorry, it's not a trivial database, but like DOAJ it is not selective enough for NJournals. --
Randykitty (
talk) 09:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Is it possible to get some more time? I think I could find some better references.
Eplaner (
talk) 11:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
clpo13(
talk) 22:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)reply
I have seen that someone added that JSDEWES is on SCOPUS now...but with poor reference?
Eplaner (
talk) 08:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The most recent journal list (linked on
this page) lists a "Journal of Sustainable Development" as being discontinued, but it has a different ISSN. The journal being discussed here is not listed. --
Randykitty (
talk) 10:44, 7 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:38, 8 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Does a number of citations in various scientific papers add up for notability in the field?
Eplaner (
talk) 10:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.