The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Courcelles 22:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete Even if it was well-known it wouldn't be a suitable topic for WP, by
WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. It's not even a dictionary of Yankee jargon.
BigJim707 (
talk) 02:05, 19 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete I think there are insufficient secondary sources to justify an encyclopedia article on this.
Mark Arsten (
talk) 04:09, 19 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete - per nom (except the bit about being a Yankee fan).
Rlendog (
talk) 20:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete. Soriano has been injured for half the season, so there is not nearly enough sources for this. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Benny Leo (
talk •
contribs) 06:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete Lack of reliable sourcing to show that this term has any lasting or widespread usage or significance. The only sourcing is an entry added four months ago to the urban dictionary (added by a random user) and a mention in a blog site called Yankeeology. Every little bit of Yankee trivia does not belong on Wikipedia.
Cbl62 (
talk) 21:49, 26 August 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.