- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to USS Bangust. What content to merge is left to editor discretion. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 14:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Joseph Bangust
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joseph Bangust ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG as a one-time recipient of the Navy Cross. Lettler hello • contribs 16:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 16:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 16:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettler hello • contribs 16:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep A warship was named after him which is a "significant award or honor and so passes WP:ANYBIO. Andrew🐉( talk) 18:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to USS Bangust. Fails WP:SOLDIER (Aviation Machinist mate 2nd class posthumously awarded a Navy Cross. Having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and WP:GNG. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable. Mztourist ( talk) 03:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Merge to USS Bangust. I concur he doesn't meet NBIO/NSOLDIER but there is some mergable content here (but unfortunately not footnoted). The ship can have a section about its non-notable namesake.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect and Merge to USS Bangust, it's more appropriate to have relevant information about a ship's namesake in the ship's article than a completely separate article. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 14:17, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Merge into USS Bangust, not enough significant coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NSOLDIER. Onel5969 TT me 18:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to USS Bangust, fails GNG. Cavalryman ( talk) 02:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.