The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild ( talk) 19:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The fourth recreation of a speedied non- notable biography. Notability is vaguely asserted but an examination of the citations reveals that some don't refer to the individual named, merely his associates, and the rest are not reliable sources. I wanted to get the community's opinion of this so the article could be conclusively dealt with. Accounting4Taste: talk 19:11, 3 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete: The issue is not whether the article is well-formatted or not. The actor in question already has an IMDB entry, and that only lists some upcoming film roles, so he is clearly not notable as an actor. As for the modelling, there is definitely not "substantial" independent coverage of his career. Let IMDB do its job of listing all actors, notable or not, and let WP do its job of providing encyclopedic coverage of notable topics. -- Slashme ( talk) 11:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete: The keyword seems to be 'Vanity Page.' Stijndon ( talk) 14:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC) reply