- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 03:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Joost de Valk
- Joost de Valk ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Only sourced by blogs. The article in The Guardian could have been a good source but Joost de Valk is not mentioned in this article. gidonb ( talk) 15:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Weak delete - Subject is covered in reliable sources, just not in detail. Meatsgains ( talk) 20:22, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 10:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 10:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as not only is the above then acknowledging deletion is needed given there's no actual substance, it's actually clear this man's article and the company's own have only existed for advertising since the company's own article in fact has under "Reception".....republishing of its own words, so there went the supposedly "independent coverage" if there's nothing as it is. SwisterTwister talk 01:04, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.