- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:NOQUORUM, closing in favour of delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Jonathan Radway
- Jonathan Radway ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't believe a District judge is de facto notable Uhooep ( talk) 10:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 16:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 16:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as searches found nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 04:54, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.