The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
fails
WP:ANYBIO. Pretty obviously an
WP:UPE creation. Tons of sources, the vast majority of which are not reliable and the few that are are either off point or not detailed discussion.
John from Idegon (
talk) 19:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)reply
KEEP: Subject passes as notable, cited TED talk, INC Magazine feature, and numerous published works being the strongest examples. The latter of which clearly meets
WP:ANYBIO, given that the person HAS indeed created or a significant or well-known work or collective body of work with his superlearner series. I'd agree that the article clearly needs considerable pruning, though, as a few sources used to make biographical points are indeed unreliable, to
John from Idegon's point. 08:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
109.64.180.116 (
talk) —
109.64.180.116 (
talk) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Speedy Delete Pure advert. Most of the sources seem to be by the subject not about him. Just {{db-g11}} as unambiguous advertising and likely
paid editing. Fails
WP:GNG and everything else including the claim of
WP:ANYBIO as self-help 'stuff' is not the type of "significant or well-known work or collective body of work" envisaged by that criteria.
Jbh Talk 01:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Lack of indepth coverage for GNG.
D4iNa4 (
talk) 19:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - Subject lacks any
WP:SIGCOV. All of the references are podcasts where you can apply to be on to self promote. A notable entrepreneur would have articles in Forbes, or similar.
Pilot333 (
talk) 03:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Lacks SIGCOV per my BEFORE. I don't see him passing AUTHOR. And giving a TEDx talk is not particularly notable (as opposed to TED).
Icewhiz (
talk) 11:49, 20 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - the most notable thing about him seems to be the book, yet I can't find coverage that suggests it deserves its own article either. Fails
WP:GNG.
TimTempleton(talk)(cont) 22:24, 20 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.